There are explosive
discussions on smart phone Apps and programs like Adhar card being an intrusion
on the privacy of individuals. The latest App victim is the much touted health
App, Arogya Setu, made compulsory by the Central Government in some
circustances, during the pandemic times.
It is common knowledge since many years that Apps can trace your
Web habits, look into your contact list, make phone calls without your
knowledge, track your location, examine your files and more. They can also
automatically send information such as location data to mobile ad networks and
wherever.
In addition, apps can gather the phone number and the unique ID
number like the International Mobile Equipment Identity (IMEI) of each type of
phone. Personal information these apps gather from your phone can be matched to
these IDs. That means this information can in some cases be used to infringe
your bank accounts, direct targeted advertisements and probably even blackmail
you after gathering sensitive information regarding your personal life. Apps
are also selling additional information in the market, including users'
location, age, gender, income, ethnicity, sexual orientation and political
views.
It's not as if you weren't warned. Before you download an App you
are warned in a subtle way of all these. Some of us heed the warnings and take
precautions so that we can leverage the many facilities afforded by these Apps
in easing our life. But generally, most people ignore these “warnings” and in a
manner accept this violation of privacy and individualism – and continue to crib
about the violations.
(With malice to none) In the wake of this “App”ropriation of
individual exclusiveness by these Apps, here is a provocative question. Are
individualism and religion reconcilable? Are they antithetical and
diametrically opposed to each other?
Most people within religion or outside of it, will
say that religion essentially is conformist. Most religions have set out
laws that govern your thoughts, actions, the way you dress, pray, eat, drink
and many more. An individual can be profiled to a great extent by his
religion. Some will justify the conformity as for the greater good, there has
to be a certain type of conformity for greater good of the society. Some of these dictates are
not moral relativism; it’s an absolute set of laws such as Thou shalt not kill,
Thou shalt not steal etc. But there are many more prescriptions laid down which
unabashedly regulate daily life to the extent of how men and women should dress
– and people just accept them or are forcibly made to accept them; no cribbing
here.
When you ask individuals, one on one, what their priorities are
most say it is self-expression and religion is down at the lowest end of the
spectrum. Yet most fail to see how Religion is controlling their lives. No
cribbing there. The problem is that Religion has become
so bureaucratic and God has become so stereotyped into a superimposed being
with a dogmatic set of laws rendering religious followers to unabashed
exploitation much like the modern Apps in your smart phones – yet nobody cribs.
We consider this millennium to be a celebration of the self, as
the Times put it. In this millennium the self has emerged, and we’re on our
own, for better or for worse, as opposed to the first millennium, where God was
the center of the universe. Individuality is not just an
inherent right of birth it is the right of all beings. So, in no way should religion,
or a Divine institution in the spirit of God contradict, repress, suppress, or
compromise that individuality.
Yet people don’t crib!!!